News center

The future of Flowmetering

2003-03-28 - "The growing interest surrounding leakage and revenue metering will increasingly become one of the main factors driving demand for more sophisticated flowmetering systems in the water sector." So says Dr Bryan Franklin, Flow Products Manager, ABB Limited.

The topic of flowmetering in the water industry is progressively coming into its own as operators become more sophisticated in their awareness of the options available, particularly for revenue metering and leakage monitoring, offering significant potential cost savings that can add to the bottom line.

Flowmetering in the water industry has been characterised by the use of traditional mechanical meters. Simple to operate and with a low price tag, these meters have long been seen as an attractive flowmetering option.

However, there are a number of things to remember about this type of equipment, all of which can lead to additional costs later down the line.

Firstly, it will only ever be truly accurate on the first day of installation. After that time, the meter’s accuracy will steadily deteriorate, due to the inevitable wearing of the mechanical components. Whilst a loss of accuracy of a few percentage points may not appear that significant, the potential loss of revenue that this represents is becoming of increasing interest as water companies look for ways to achieve more precise flow measurement and improve their profitability and levels of service.

The second thing to bear in mind is the meter’s total cost of ownership. This includes not just the cost of maintaining the meter, with its associated disruption as the meter is removed from the line, but also the cost of sending someone to manually collect information from several meters at a time.

An added consideration is the pressure being applied on water companies by OFWAT to more accurately identify and address leakages throughout their supply networks. This has already led some water companies to employ new technologies providing more accurate monitoring and featuring additional capabilities, such as remote GSM communication, which enable leaks and other problems to be immediately traced and rectified.

Electronic flowmetering - the future?
‘Electronic’ flowmeters that work on the magnetic, ultrasonic and other principles and incorporate electrical, rather than mechanical sensing equipment, have been around in various guises for some time. Yet with the exception of the MagMeter, they have generally been slow to be adopted by the water industry, due mainly to a comparatively higher purchase cost than mechanical metering equipment. However, in most cases, payback on the installation of an electronic flowmeter could actually be achieved in a matter of days, as demonstrated by the following example.

Let’s assume that we have a mechanical 6" flowmeter that is accurate to within ±2%. This flowmeter is installed in a line with an average flow rate of 25 litres per second, which equates to an annual usage of 788,400m3. Assuming a cost just for water at £1 per m3, over the course of one year, the inaccuracy of the meter would be losing the operator around £13,797.00 of revenue.

Now let’s assume that we replace this meter with an ABB AquaMaster electromagnetic meter, which has an accuracy of ±0.5%. Based on the above flow conditions and water cost, the meter will pay for itself within just 23 days.

Nor is this the only area where an electronic meter can achieve savings. There are no mechanical moving parts that can be subjected to wear and which will need to be replaced. This not only ensures that the meter’s accuracy is constant throughout its service life, but eliminates the cost, time and disruption associated with removing the meter from the line for maintenance.

Developments in remote communications technology also mean it is now no longer necessary for staff to be deployed to read meters or check on their status. ABB’s AquaMaster flowmeter, for example, incorporates GSM communications technology, providing operators with instant access to real-time data and also historical flow data logged by the meter. This technology has also made it possible to include a dial-out alarm which warns the operators whenever a problem occurs.

Using in-situ calibration equipment, such as ABB’s CalMaster, flowmeters buried underground or installed in underground chambers can now also be tested from the surface via a laptop computer, enabling easy and cost-effective performance checks without interrupting the continuity of water supply. This equipment can also be used to provide a diagnostic health check on the entire flowmeter system together with an early warning of any deterioration likely to lead to system failure.

Making the transition
Despite the cost benefits that electronic meters can bring, the water industry market is still primarily dominated by their mechanical counterparts and will probably continue to be so for many years to come.

What is becoming obvious, however, is the shift in emphasis amongst water operators towards understanding the idea of cost of ownership, which takes into account all the costs incurred throughout the life of a flowmeter instead of just its purchase price.

One reason for this is the growing trend toward companies outsourcing responsibility for both supplying and running equipment to contractors, which must ensure they opt for the solutions offering best value for money over the long term.

Added to this is the capability of modern electronic flowmetering equipment to integrate with other equipment to provide operators with a wealth of information that was previously unavailable. When used with equipment such as data recorders and water quality monitoring devices such as turbidity monitors, flowmeters can be used to collect data that can be employed for uses such as improving water quality or optimising network performance.

To summarise, the water market is likely to see a steady rise in demand for electronic flowmetering, as users increasingly become aware of the benefits that these flowmeters can bring to the bottom line in terms of reduced cost of ownership and the ability to identify areas where revenue is currently being lost.

  • Rate this page
     
  • E-mail this page